Effective Height and Defending the Paint

     Last week, Tom Haberstroh had an excellent post at Hardwood Paroxysm, examining the relationship between a team’s collective height and their rebounding performance. He gathered the height measurements for each player and then weighted it by the minutes they played for their team. The result was a metric he calls “effective height.” Haberstroh found their to be a decent correlation (.33) between effective height and total rebounding percentage. When looking at rebounding by category there was almost no correlation (-0.03) between effective height and defensive rebounding percentage, but a reasonably strong correlation (0.42) between effective height and offensive rebounding percentage. It’s a terrific post and definitely worth a read.

    I was really intrigued by his analysis, especially by the idea of effective height. I have been baffled recently by a few questions which seem related. One is, How do you predict which college players will become effective NBA shot blockers? The other is, How do you explain the Pacers being an average defensive team with an apparent lack of shot blocking, but still holding their opponents to the sixth lowest At Rim FG% in the league? I decided to use Haberstroh’s effective height data and compare it to three statistics. The first is each team’s block rate, or what percentage of an opponent’s shots they blocked. The second is At Rim FG%, or the FG% each team held their opponents to on shots at the rim. The third is Opponents At Rim%, or what percentage of an opponents shots were taken at the rim.

Team eHeight BLKR At Rim FG% O At Rim%
SAC 79.85 4.6 (24th) 64.3% (27th) 32.2% (12th)
TOR 79.66 4.9 (22nd) 60.3% (15th) 32.6% (15th)
MEM 79.47 5.0 (19th) 62.5% (22nd) 36.0% (28th)
PHO 79.43 5.2 (15th) 59.8% (11th) 30.4% (8th)
CLE 79.40 5.5 (9th) 58.3% (7th) 29.3% (2nd)
ATL 79.36 5.4 (10th) 60.7% (16th) 33.7% (22nd)
OKC 79.25 6.1 (1st) 60.1% (13th) 36.1% (29th)
NJN 79.17 5.1 (17th) 61.7% (20th) 37.2% (30th)
MIN 79.11 3.8 (28th) 66.0% (30th) 31.5% (10th)
LAL 79.09 5.1 (16th) 59.8% (10th) 32.3% (13th)
LAC 79.09 6.0 (3rd) 61.7% (19th) 33.2% (20th)
WAS 79.04 5.4 (12th) 65.9% (29th) 29.1% (1st)
IND 79.01 5.4 (11th) 58.3% (6th) 29.8% (5th)
POR 78.99 4.7 (23rd) 61.9% (21st) 33.5% (21st)
UTH 78.96 5.1 (18th) 60.1% (14th) 33.0% (17th)
DET 78.95 4.2 (25th) 62.8% (24th) 33.1% (18th)
NYK 78.95 3.8 (30th) 63.5% (25th) 34.2% (24th)
CHI 78.87 6.0 (2nd) 56.8% (1st) 33.2% (19th)
ORL 78.76 5.9 (5th) 57.4% (2nd) 29.4% (3rd)
DEN 78.70 5.2 (14th) 60.1% (12th) 32.5% (14th)
DAL 78.56 5.7 (7th) 61.1% (17th) 30.0% (7th)
SAS 78.44 4.9 (21st) 58.1% (5th) 31.1% (9th)
CHA 78.44 5.8 (6th) 59.0% (9th) 34.2% (25th)
NOR 78.44 3.8 (29th) 64.9% (28th) 34.5% (26th)
PHI 78.44 5.7 (8th) 61.1% (18th) 34.6% (27th)
MIL 78.30 4.9 (20th) 58.1% (4th) 33.0% (16th)
MIA 78.28 6.0 (4th) 58.1% (3rd) 29.8% (4th)
BOS 78.25 5.2 (13th) 58.5% (8th) 29.9% (6th)
HOU 78.21 4.0 (27th) 62.7% (23rd) 33.8% (23rd)
GSW 77.91 4.0 (26th) 64.3% (26th) 31.6% (11th)
Average 78.88 5.1 61.0% 32.5%

     I was surprised to find in each case there was almost no correlation whatsoever.

  • Correlation between eHeight and BLKR:  0.096
  • Correlation between eHeight and At Rim FG%:  0.133
  • Correlation between eHeight an O At Rim %:  0.128

     Obviously, it takes more than height to defend the basket well. These numbers would seem to emphasize the importance of denying dribble penetration and challenging shots, even if you can’t block them. In the comments section of the Hardwood Paroxysm post someone mentioned the idea of calculating the effective height of just the front court players of each team, as having tall backcourt players can greatly increase a team’s effective height but may not make a difference in rebounding number,s since they spend much of their time away from the basket. Hopefully, I can crunch those effective height numbers for just frontcourt players soon and try running them against these three statistical categories. Perhaps we will see a stronger correlation. Stay tuned . . .


Filed under Indiana Pacers, NBA, Statistical Analysis

2 responses to “Effective Height and Defending the Paint

  1. Josh Dhani

    Good stuff

  2. Pingback: Swapping Batman and The King: Switching Teams For LeBron and Granger « Hardcourt Mayhem

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s